About this Show

The Rachel Maddow Show

News/Business. Politics, pop culture and today's top stories.

NETWORK

DURATION
01:00:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
San Francisco, CA, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Virtual Ch. 787 (MSNBC HD)

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
1920

PIXEL HEIGHT
1080

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Us 12, Cia 12, Fbi 11, Florida 8, Washington 7, Paul Brown 6, Campbell 6, Andrea Mitchell 6, David Petraeus 5, Paul Ryan 5, Mr. Romney 4, New York 3, Donald Trump 3, George W. Bush 3, Clinton 3, John Boehner 3, Nbc 3, Birmingham 3, California 3, Msnbc 3,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  MSNBC    The Rachel Maddow Show    News/Business. Politics, pop  
   culture and today's top stories.  

    November 10, 2012
    3:00 - 4:00am PST  

3:00am
a day to open doors, and welcome the millions of customers who will turn out to shop small. small business saturday. visit shopsmall.com and get ready. because your day is coming. it was a huge news day in washington today. you sort of expect after a national presidential election that you could get a few days of afterglow. let it all sink in with no big new things happening. maybe that was the way it went over the last couple of days. that definitely ended today starting with this. >> thank you. thank you, everybody. thank you. now that those of us on the campaign trail have had a chance to get a little sleep, it's time
3:01am
to get back to work and there's plenty of work to do. as i said on tuesday night, the american people voted for action not politics as usual. you elected us to focus on your jobs, not ours. and in that spirit, i've invited leaders of both parties to the white house next week so we can start to build consensus around the challenges that we can only solve together. at a time when our economy is still recovering from the great recession, our top priority has to be jobs and growth. that's the focus of the plan that i talked about during the campaign. >> president obama spoke publicly the night that he won his second term when he gave his basic victory speech in chicago. thereafter, though, he did speak privately to some of his campaign volunteers in chicago. we likely would have never known about that or seen any tape of those remarks if not for the fact that the president, while he was speaking with those
3:02am
volunteers, he did something which he almost never does. he choked up and he started crying when he was thanking his volunteers. so that tape ended up being very widely seen. that was not a public event. today's remarks in the east room of the white house were the first time that president obama has made an official public statement of any kind since election night. you can tell that in part by the huge round of applause he got as he walked into the room. applause from people invited to attend the speech and a bunch of white house staffers who may have not seen the president and vice president since they earned themselves another term and ensured all of those white house staffers continuing employment at the white house for the next four years. so needless to say, everybody in that room was all very happy to see him. and in these remarks that he gave today, though, the president proposed that congress act right now to extend the bush tax cuts that are due to expire at the end of the year. the president said democrats and republicans both agree that those tax cuts should be extended for all income under a quarter million dollars a year.
3:03am
and so he said congress should pass legislation to just do that right now since everybody agrees on it, even if the two sides are likely to keep fighting about what the tax rates should be for income above a quarter million dollars a year. he's essentially saying let's take action on what we agree on and let's keep debating on what we disagree on. the president took his pen out of his pocket and waved it in the air at one point in these remarks today. said he was ready to sign a bill doing that extension of the bush tax cuts right now. that moment from him was going to be the biggest news in american politics today until exactly one hour and 45 minutes later, when andrea mitchell, nbc's chief foreign affairs correspondent, broke into msnbc programming at 2:51 this afternoon with a remarkable scoop. you know, everybody in -- everybody in washington, everybody in politics right now, so focused on figuring out what's going to happen in the obama administration's second term. there's two components. one of them is policy and fighting stuff out with congress
3:04am
like you saw the president address in those remarks today in the east room. but the other side of it, the other side of what everybody is obsessed with right now is who's the obama administration for the president's second term? when andrea mitchell got on air today at 2:51 p.m. and announced that general david petraeus was resigning unexpectedly and immediately as head of the cia, that second question in washington, the question of who is going to hold the most important jobs in the obama administration now, who is going to run the country on a day-to-day basis, this thing that everybody knows is due to change dramatically for the second term, at 2:51 today when andrea got on the air on msnbc, that stuff started to change already. when andrea mitchell broke this news about general rhett payous. we're going to speak with richard engle about this in a moment. about what the news of general petraeus means for the winning of that part of the government. we'll be talking with andrea about her scoop today. in order to appreciate how big a deal this is, how surprising it is, how not just consequential but potentially further consequential this thing is that happened today, you should know
3:05am
that before this was a reportable story, before it was clear what had actually happened and that andrea was going to be able to report the reasons for general petraeus saying he was resigning we were hearing all sorts of things about potential reasons why he might be resigning. maybe he had irreconcilable political differences with president obama. he had to resign because of some huge political disagreement. it was rumored before andrea's report that maybe general petraeus had been in talks to take a job with the romney administration. he had been plotting that move behind president obama's back and the disloyalty was the reason he had to go. there was speculation he would have to step down because of something related to the benghazi consulate attack which he was scheduled to testify about next week before congress. before this was a reportable story and we knew for sure that he was going and why, the theories and the breathless speculation about why david petraeus was resigning from the cia went all the way up to and included the idea that maybe he was stepping down to start running as a republican for president in 2016 right now.
3:06am
until we knew what happened, people were crawling up the walls about this announcement from david petraeus today. and then andrea broke the story. and david petraeus it turns out, is leaving the cia because he had an extramarital affair. it was a personal matter. just an unbelievable news day today. joining us now is andrea mitchell. nbc's chief foreign affairs correspondent and the host of msnbc's "andrea mitchell reports." congratulations on this scoop. thanks for being here. >> thank you. i have to tell you, i don't take any pleasure in this in the sense that this is really a personal tragedy and there are families involved, people involved on all sides, and the men and women of the cia, an agency that has many -- many things to be proud about. many things to be proud about and that is under fire for other reasons. >> are you totally confident that this affair, this personal matter, is the full reason why general petraeus resigned today? and in so answering, i mean, are we sure that something like that would force him to resign this job? >> i am.
3:07am
i have that confidence. we had worked for 24 hours on this story. as it was evolving in talking to so many people in and out of government, and having covered general petraeus myself here and overseas, i am absolutely convinced, from all the communications i've had from people directly involved that this was a matter of honor. that he felt he had to offer his resignation. the president said to him i want to take 24 hours to think about it, and there was a lot involved. i think absent the fbi investigation which we are told by law enforcement officials are unlikely to lead to any criminal charges. it is an issue that has to be investigated because there's schur communications involved and there are classification rules. absent that investigation i'm not sure whether he could have soldiered through -- a pun i probably should not make -- and not have to resign. perhaps the president would not have accepted the resignation.
3:08am
dianne feinstein said today that she wished the president had not accepted the resignation. she very strongly believed that he was a key and essential piece of the national security community, and of this administration. i'm not sure whether the personal transgression although there's a code of honor and he felt strongly that he had frankly, screwed up, and that he had to pay the consequences, and after 24 hours, and clearly consulting his colleagues, other people in the national security community, don't know who else, the president agreed and accepted it on the phone in a conversation this afternoon. >> andrea mitchell congratulations on this reporting that led to this scoop. i take your point this is not something to be enthusiastic about having uncovered giving the tragic nature of the news but your reporting on this was absolutely cutting edge. thank you for joining us to help us understand it tonight. >> thank you. >> let's bring in richard engle for more. richard, i know that you've been
3:09am
reporting on some other developments about this case. andrea mentioned the role that fbi investigation in terms of how this came to light. what can you tell us? >> we know the facts and the facts are that this afternoon, general petraeus, cia director, came out and said that he was going to resign because of this extramarital affair. he didn't name any names. we also know at the same time that the fbi is conducting an investigation, an ongoing investigation, into general petraeus' biographer. a woman named paula broadwell. this is a woman who had close access to general petraeus, and the fbi is looking at the access that she had or was trying to have to his e-mail accounts. including potentially classified information. as andrea said, there's no indication that she got very far, that any classified information was divulged, that
3:10am
there's not going to be criminal charges, and no implication that general petraeus himself was under investigation for passing along any secrets. but that's what we learned about the fbi's piece in this. >> is it our understanding that the fbi investigation into that side of it is the reason this had to happen today. and with some urgency, that it was going to become widely known, if not publicly known? >> we haven't been able to confirm that direct link. we've spoken to law enforcement officials who have made a roundabout link into this, but no one has said that the reason he's stepping down is because there was an fbi investigation into this woman as he's announcing his extramarital affairs. the timing piece of it while this fbi investigation may have been a factor, we haven't been told it was the factor that led him to make this announcement today. >> with absent the fbi investigation, had that not happened, the fact of the affair, would that be dangerous enough to somebody in
3:11am
the job as being head of the cia that that itself would cause -- would force a resignation just because of the threat of black mail or anything else that might promise it? >> we did speak to law enforcement officials. they said that blackmail is a concern whenever you have this kind of conversation, whenever you have the cia director, who has all of the nation's secrets on his computer, when you have him talking about extramarital affair, they said blackmail is something that they are immediately concerned about. they didn't say in this case they had found any evidence about specific attempts at blackmail but that's a concern. when you have someone probing around the cia director's e-mail, and the cia is talking about openly having had a extramarital affair, it leaves you in a vulnerable position. >> in terms of david petraeus in this specific role, obviously he's most known for his role in the iraq war and then going to afghanistan. president obama dispatched him to afghanistan after general stanley mcchrystal had to resign, was fired, had to resign
3:12am
there because of other kind of personal indiscretions. but how important was petraeus' leadership, specifically at the cia? how big a blow is this to the agency? >> he actually wasn't very popular in certain circles inside the cia. his own personal security staff and this we've heard from multiple sources, not just today but over the last several weeks, didn't really like him. they thought he brought in his own people. he was not an insider from the cia and the cia is a bit of an old fashioned club. they like it if you come up through the ranks. there was talk -- one person at the cia and one person formerly at the cia put it to me this way. the cia would have had to ask the fbi to look into e-mails that were suspicious. the cia handles its own security and the fbi would have had to be
3:13am
brought in to examine somebody suspiciously trying to pry into the director's account. which does not suggest a real warmth within the organization. >> this is an incredible resignation with incredible timing. i have a feeling as we get more detail on this as it goes forward it's going to become an even more important story. richard engel, nbc's chief foreign correspondent. thank you. richard engel, thank you. i feel a feeling we'll be talking about this shortly. who's in charge of the republican party now? simple question with a difficult answer. that's coming up. were! [ husband ] transfer! [ male announcer ] free data transfer at home. you just deleted all the photos! you did! no you did! [ male announcer ] or free data transfer when you buy a windows 8 computer at staples. another way staples makes it easier to upgrade. when you buy a windows 8 computer at staples. try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, fortunately we've got ink.
3:14am
it gives us 5x the rewards on our internet, phone charges and cable, plus at office supply stores. rewards we put right back into our business. this is the only thing we've ever wanted to do and ink helps us do it. make your mark with ink from chase.
3:15am
beyond the first appearance of the president since the election and the shocking surprise resignation of general petraeus as head of the cia, there was another bombshell dropped late today from the united states supreme court. big news day today. that's ahead. [ male announcer ] humana and walmart have teamed up
3:16am
to bring you a low-priced medicare prescription drug plan. ♪ with a low national plan premium... ♪ ...and copays as low as one dollar... ♪ ...saving on your medicare prescriptions is easy. ♪ so you're free to focus on the things that really matter. call humana at 1-800-808-4003. or go to walmart.com for details.
3:17am
[ male announcer ] it's that time of year. time for campbell's green bean casserole. you'll find the recipe at campbellskitchen.com. ♪ campbell's. it's amazing what soup can do. and another question about a firebrand in his party. the man who ran for vice president, stick still congressman paul ryan. >> congressman paul ryan, is he the leader of the republican party now? >> i wouldn't think so. paul ryan is a policy wonk. >> oh, i wouldn't think so. john boehner laughing in the face of the idea that the leader of the republican party from here on out might be paul ryan. that guy? the republican party picking its new face, its new leader after their electoral disaster. that's going to be an amazing thing to watch. over the next few weeks, months, years. i mean, here's just a case in point. it was an overall electoral
3:18am
disaster for republicans to lose the presidency. it was thought to be impossible for them to lose the presidency. nobody since the great depression has ever been re-elected as president with an unemployment rate like the one we've got now. but barack obama managed to do it. or the republicans managed to blow it depending how you look at it. just take as a case in point. the tremendous republican disaster in the united states senate. i mean, they had a bad night on tuesday night. but in the senate, it was a sure bet that the republicans were supposed to retake control of the senate this year. a sure bet. they were only defending ten seats and the democrats were defending 23. that's a tilted playing field like this. not only did the republicans not retake the senate, the democrats held on to control and increased their margins. that's impossible. that is an impossible republican failure in a year like this. and the depth of that failure is bottomless. look at how they failed the more astonishing it is how badly they failed. not only did mitt romney lose the presidency but in terms of
3:19am
losing republican senate candidates in 11 states, the republican senate candidates did even worse with voters than mitt romney did in those states. mitt romney who lost. the country said no to mitt romney this week, but they said oh, no, no, no, no to republican senate candidates. it was just a catastrophe from north dakota to florida and everywhere in between. who was to blame for that? that is not an esoteric matter. there is a named person in charge of making sure republicans win senate seats. there was somebody who was in charge of that. for every election. and that specific person in this election obviously failed catastrophically. that specific person is named john cornyn. today the republican party appears ready to respond to his atrocious failure at this job this week. by giving mr. cornyn a promotion. he's getting a reward for nearly shooting the moon in the senate. for doing as bad as humanly possible. at the last job the republican party gave him. the republican party moving
3:20am
forward, apparently would like him to be the number two republican in the whole senate right behind mitch mcconnell. and that is calling failing up. which is amazing on its own terms. in terms of republicans in the senate. i think we also should wonder if that is instructive for how the republican party is going to deal with the overall question of who their leader is and what they stand for after this electoral drubbing they took in this week's election. "the washington post" reporting today that the republican party is going to undertake a big internal review of what went wrong on tuesday. reportedly take place over the next few weeks and months. spearheaded by republican party national officials. the goal of the review is to determine, quote, what went so wrong and how to fix it. good idea. yeah. let's review. it's a good idea because the informal process so far of the right trying to figure out what went wrong for republicans this election, that informal process so far is not going well. republicans have so far decided that hurricane sandy is the reason mitt romney lost.
3:21am
they have also decided that fact checking is the reason mitt romney lost. karl rove said it's democratic voter suppression is the reason mitt romney lost. really? there was also a satirical blog post, a piece of comedy, written about military votes not being counted. and that got parts of the right very excited today that that was the reason that mitt romney lost. until they realized that that blog post was satire. the republican effort so far to diagnose what went wrong on tuesday, why mitt romney lost, that effort has not gone very well. take conservative columnists. in the "washington post" today, he took a stab at diagnosing what ails the republicans now. specifically, he assessed why the republican party has an issue with women voters. this was his assessment, quote, the problem here for republicans is not policy, but delicacy. speaking about culturally sensitive and philosophically complex issues with reflection and prudence. republicans don't have a policy problem when it comes to women's issues.
3:22am
in other words, they just speak about their policy preferences on women's issues with insufficient delicacy. women don't mind that this is how republicans are governing with respect to women's rights they just like to hear that their rights are being repealed. in more flowery prose? i mean the diagnosis is that republicans should just find a more delicate way to describe things like mandatory, medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasounds at the order of bob mcdonnell. you can say that more softly, you can say it in cursive if you want to. but it's probably still going to bring tens of thousands of protesters outen the streets to line your walk of shame into the building from which you were trying to govern that way. in ohio mitt romney lost women by 11 points. he lost the state and the presidency. since republicans are telling themselves that the gender gap has nothing to do with policy, you want to know what ohio republicans have done since the election on tuesday? ohio republicans today said they're going to reintroduce their bill from last session to
3:23am
ban almost all abortions in ohio. that should take care of your problem with women voters. republican party right now finds itself at a cross roads. once again. in the year 2000, we knew george w. bush's choice of vice president, dick cheney, would never himself run for president. he's not healthy enough, not young enough, not popular enough. we knew 12 years ago that george w. bush was coming into office with no heir apparent. with no obvious successor. since the end of george w. bush's two terms in office the most interesting thing in american politics has been watching the republican party trying to figure out who their leader would be post-george w. bush. we knew it would never be dick cheney. it did not end up being john mccain. it definitely did not end up being sarah palin. for awhile it looked like it would be michael steele. when they picked him to run the party. maybe? no. how about john boehner? speaker of the house, previous republican house speakers have been able to fashion that job into a national leadership role. but john boehner has not done that. i mean no disrespect, but nobody
3:24am
thinks of him as the leader of the republican party. mitt romney did have that job. mitt romney for awhile was the leader of the republican party. we can prove it with evidence. this past june president obama walked out into the rose garden and announced he was going to stop the deportation of kids who were here without papers through no fault of their own. when president obama announced that, beltway reporters immediately went to the republican leaders in congress to see what's the official response from that? what's the official republican position on that issue. here's what the reporters were told by the republicans in congress. "senate republican leader mitch mcconnell said tuesday that gop lawmakers will wait for mitt romney to take the lead on immigration policy. quote, most of our members are interested in what governor romney has to say about this issue and we're going to withhold judgment, most of us, until that time. mr. romney was not just the de facto leader of the republican party. he was the stated leader of the republican party. now that he's lost the
3:25am
presidency, obviously, nobody thinks that mitt romney going forward is going to continue to play the role of leader of the republican party. the boston globe reported that mr. romney is likely to move to la jolla, california, to spend more time with his car, presumably. but in his short time as leader of the republican party, when he was their presidential nominee, he made leadership decisions about the party. about what the party's like. about what the party looks like to the rest of the country. he made leadership decisions particularly in terms of who he would dignify with his embrace. who among everybody in the republican party, he, mitt romney, leader of the party, would privilege. who he would elevate. he elevated guys like chris cobach. the republican guy who wrote arizona's papers please immigration law. he was mitt romney's immigration adviser. he made and then kept as his
3:26am
national campaign chairman a man named john sununu who called president obama lazy and not very bright and said president obama needs to, quote, learn how to be an american. mitt romney's national campaign chairman. mr. romney also elevated and dignified by his presence, i'm sorry to have to say the name, but this guy, donald trump. mitt romney as the leader of the republican party as their presidential standardbearer flew out to las vegas to bernly receive donald trump's endorsement. mr. romney's running mate paul ryan held special in-person events with donald trump. he did robocalls throughout the campaign and he wasn't freelancing. mitt romney asked him to do it. he did have the leadership reins of the republican party for a brief moment as their presidential candidate. and what he did with that position of leadership is going to haunt the republican party prospects of being taken seriously for a long time to come. so the question now, as it has been for many years now, is who's next? who runs that party? who is their leader now?
3:27am
how could a luminous protein in jellyfish, impact life expectancy in the u.s., real estate in hong kong, and the optics industry in germany? at t. rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex, global economy. it's just one reason over 75% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. [ tylenol bottle ] me too! and nasal congestion. [ tissue box ] he said nasal congestion. yeah...i heard him. [ female announcer ] tylenol® cold multi-symptom nighttime relieves nasal congestion. nyquil® cold and flu doesn't.
3:28am
[ male announcer ] the way it moves. the way it cleans. everything about the oral-b power brush is simply revolutionary. oral-b power brushes oscillate, rotate and even pulsate to gently loosen and break up that sticky plaque with more brush movements than manual brushes and even up to 50% more than leading sonic technology brushes for a superior clean. oral-b power brushes. go to oralb.com for the latest offers.
3:29am
3:30am
one unaffiliated candidate made a mark on the 2012 election. he's an englishman who did not spend a nickel on a campaign or give one speech. he's an englishman by the name of charles darwin who made the most excellent mark of anyone on any ballot across the country this year. that excellent story and an accompanying beverage coming up. . or that printing in color had to cost a fortune.
3:31am
nobody said an all-in-one had to be bulky. or that you had to print from your desk. at least, nobody said it to us. introducing the business smart inkjet all-in-one series from brother. easy to use, it's the ultimate combination of speed, small size, and low-cost printing. a cup of johan is a 600 horsepower sports coupe that likes to hug curves. ♪ your curves. smooth, rich, never bitter, gevalia.
3:32am
and i took on all the bigger, tougher ones. but with mr. clean's new select-a-size magic eraser, he can take on any size job. at least we don't go near rex's mobile home as often. what are you, scared? [ dog barks ] aah! oh! [ male announcer ] new mr. clean select-a-size magic eraser. i have a cold... i took dayquil, but i still have a runny nose.
3:33am
[ male announcer ] truth is, dayquil doesn't work on runny noses. what? [ male announcer ] it doesn't have an antihistamine. really? [ male announcer ] really. alka-seltzer plus cold and cough fights your worst cold symptoms, plus has a fast acting antihistamine to relieve your runny nose. [ sighs ] thank you! [ male announcer ] you're welcome. that's the cold truth! [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus. ♪ oh what a relief it is! ♪ [ male announcer ] to learn more about the cold truth and save $1 visit alka-seltzer on facebook. we pressed the governor today and he refused to admit he made a mistake and dodged my question about it over and over again. >> do you regret not extending early voting? >> you know what's great is people got out to vote. what we're doing is the right thing. the right thing happened. we had a big election day. >> boy did they ever have a big election day in florida. that was darlene jones from wftv in orlando trying to get an answer from florida governor rick scott about this. voters stuck in line for eight hours and more in polling places around the state of florida
3:34am
after governor scott cut the days for early voting and refused to add any of them back when the lines were that long. he says it all worked fine. the right thing happened. florida officials say the lines pop up mostly in big cities with diverse population. they say that as if that's self-explanatory in terms of why you get long lines. but seriously, florida officials, have you guys ever been to l.a.? los angeles? really big city, really diverse. we have been getting letters from people who vote in california where they opened tons and tons of polling places that serve much smaller groups of voters than the way you deal with it in florida. in california, for example, they vote at the up in tune society columbarium, they vote in their neighbor's garage. they vote at the headquarters of the venus beach lifeguards in los angeles. what californians do not do, not generally, is stand in line and wait eight hours to vote. after the cake splat of an election in florida and several other states this year, we are
3:35am
watching for ideas about how to fix our broken election system. election law expert rick hassan says we should declare a state like florida an election disaster area and bring in the feds. he says congress should nationalize the elections for every state with voter registration that follows you for life and the option of using your thumbprint as i.d. at the polls. the center for justice is recommending that congress require early voting in every state. the same amount and set a standard for the number of voting machines so every polling place has enough to go around. if you want to take the long view senator hillary clinton's old count every vote act that's still kicking around from 2005, then-senator clinton wanted to declare a federal holiday for voting. she wanted to send money to states for modernizing elections. here's an idea. how about when hillary clinton finishes up her time as secretary of state, how about she and former supreme court justice sandra day o'connor lead a commission on reform, a national nonpartisan election reform commission. i would be for that. who would be against that? we're getting to a point we can't ignore the failings of our election system.
3:36am
we can't guarantee the vote to citizens and then ask those citizens in states around the country to stand in lines that start before dawn and end after midnight. we can't guarantee them the right to vote and look at these pictures and call it good. we cannot. it is beyond our national conscience to accept this scandal as the state of the franchise. even if you are in the political party that stands to profit from making voting harder. these images are beyond our national conscience. and yet because voting is a federal issue and elections are administered by the states, we do not have much federal leverage over how elections are conducted. about the only leverage we have as a country, federally, is the voting rights act passed in 1965 to make sure that african-americans could vote. you want to see the lines at the polls? look at this. bloomberg news dug up this photo today. this is birmingham, alabama, in 1966. the first big election held in the south since congress passed -- after congress passed the voting rights act. the voting rights act puts the
3:37am
states in the old confederacy under special federal scrutiny because those states, and other places, earned special scrutiny on account of their past behavior. the voting rights act is there to make sure that texas doesn't wrongly purge its voter rolls or mississippi doesn't start requiring new forms of i.d. that make people unable to vote who should be allowed to vote. it's not much, but the voting rights act is more or less what we have in terms of federal leverage. federal enforcement for the right to vote. today, on a day that could not have been a bigger news day anyway, today the u.s. supreme court announced that they're going to hear a challenge to the voting rights act. to the central part of it. the lead plaintiff in the case is shelby county, alabama. just outside birmingham. where they would like that special scrutiny to please go away. they'd like to handle it themselves. joining me is the acting president and direct council of the naacp legal defense fund. thanks very much for joining us tonight. >> it's good to be with you. >> you defended the voting rights act the last time it was challenged in 2009.
3:38am
how serious a threat does this case pose to the voting rights act? >> i think it's a serious threat. any time a core civil right statute is before the supreme court testing its constitution ality we need to wake up and focus on it. we're not happy that the case is back there. we don't think it needed to be there. but we're prepared to defend it as we have successfully in the past. >> is the -- am i right to describe the voting rights act particularly the parts of it that are being challenged with this case, as sort of maximum point of federal leverage over whether or not the states do right in administering their elections? >> i think it's really a core protection. it's a fundamental piece of the whole civil rights canon. so many civil rights statutes are based on the model and the decisions upholding the voting rights act. it's really amongst the most important statutes, not only civil rights statutes, but statutes of any kind that our federal legislature has passed. >> i'm struck by the timing here. i don't understand the inner
3:39am
workings of the supreme court to know enough about why they would make an announcement about a case like this on this kind of a time frame. i'm struck by the timing just because of what else happened this week in our national elections. is it just a coincidence? >> well, it's hard to know. we won't know until we get to the justice's writings years after they retire about the timing. there was an appeal working to the court. we were looking for a ruling or a decision to hear the case possibly before the election. ultimately, it didn't come until after the election. so it's hard to say what's in the timing. but the fact of the matter is, you never want this type of challenge before the supreme court because this is a core aspect of our nation's march toward progress. >> if you could change election law, if you could at least advise congress about how to change election law, what could be done at the federal level, are there things that could be done that would protect the franchise better than it's protected now? >> absolutely. the first thing we shouldn't do is take down the protections
3:40am
that we've had. which is the issue presented in this case. what we need are more protections, not fewer. and the recent activity across the country targeted many minority communities tells us that we need more protection. there are some big things to do. universal registration that allows 18-year-olds to be registered when they have their birthday. something modelled on selective service registration or the like, but applies across the board. that would be very helpful. expand early voting. right? let's not have those lines because we have a bigger period when people can exercise their franchise. i think that would be very important. and another thing we saw this time in the elections that we don't need to have is this idea that people can go to the polls and challenge voters on election day. that's sort of an anachronistic piece of the voting story, and let's not have people there intimidating voters. challenges can be done long before election time and let the folks that administer elections have everybody vote. >> and on -- let's take specifically that piece about early voting, because that's so on people's minds right now because of the restrictions on early voting that really had the republican officials that
3:41am
restricted early voting this year never made an argument for why they were restricting it. they just said we have enough time. we have enough time. they never made a case for why they needed to get rid of the time that was there. what about the division of labor the jurisdiction between division of labor between congress saying we ought to have more early voting in every state in the country and the states asserting their own right to run elections as they see fit. how do you see that breaking down morally and legally? >> in a sense that comes back to the voting rights act. the ideas that were used to advance the discrimination against minority voters in birmingham and other places was this idea of state's rights. that the states can administer their elections, and even interpret the constitution in the way they see fit, and that there wasn't a uniform federal standard. the voting rights act was a definitive answer to that question, that the constitution must be followed and it's not for the states to pick and choose. it was an important turning point. so i think there is a federal role to play, certainly in federal elections. to bring greater uniformity. what we want as americans is more voting.
3:42am
we want to invite people to the party. not dissuade them. >> what do you think of my sandra day o'connor, hillary clinton idea? >> i'm all for it. >> you are a guy who does not persuade easily i know because of your line of work. thank you for being here. >> it's great to be here. the best write-in campaign of a person no longer living of all time. coming up with a drink. [ knock on door ] cool. you found it. wow. nice place. yeah. [ chuckles ] the family thinks i'm out shipping these. smooth move. you used priority mail flat rate boxes. if it fits, it ships for a low, flat rate. paid for postage online and arranged a free pickup. and i'm gonna track them online, too. nice. between those boxes and this place, i'm totally staying sane this year. do i smell snickerdoodles? maybe. [ timer dings ] got to go. priority mail flat rate boxes. online pricing starts at $5.15. only from the postal service. part of a whole new line of tablets from dell. it's changing the conversation.
3:43am
♪ to start her own interior design business. she's got a growing list of clients she keeps in touch with using e-mail marketing from constantcontact.com. constantcontact is easy and affordable. it lets her send out updates and photos that showcase her expertise and inspire her customers for only $15 a month. [ dog barking ] her dream -- to be the area's hottest interior design office. [ children laughing ] right now, she just dreams of an office. get a free trial at constantcontact.com. campbell's has 24 new soups that will make it drop over, and over again. ♪ from jammin' jerk chicken, to creamy gouda bisque. see what's new from campbell's. it's amazing what soup can do. [ male announcer ] the way it moves. the way it cleans. everything about the oral-b power brush
3:44am
is simply revolutionary. oral-b power brushes oscillate, rotate and even pulsate to gently loosen and break up that sticky plaque with more brush movements than manual brushes and even up to 50% more than leading sonic technology brushes for a superior clean. oral-b power brushes. go to oralb.com for the latest offers. breaking news. legitimately breaking news. we have a call to make in a governors race that we had previously not been able to call. nbc news can now project that in the great state of washington, the new governor of the state will be the democratic former congressman jay inslee. his opponent republican rob mckenna has conceded the race. he succeeds the incumbent who chose not to run for a third. again, jay inslee is the new governor of washington state. like many contests this year, it was close. and then the democrat won.
3:45am
we'll be right back.
3:46am
normally if you get hurt, the worst case scenario, you have to go to the hospital. but when the hospital is the thing that's hurt, then what do you do? right now in new york there are three hospitals so damaged they have yet to reopen since hurricane sandy. that includes the veterans hospital in manhattan, which as of this past week, looked like this. that's a lot of water where
3:47am
water is not supposed to be. according to v.a. officials, the only mri machine at the hospital is flooded and lost. the fire suppression system, the whole electrical system, the mechanical systems were all knocked out at the veterans hospital. the basement and ground floor were flooded. one tiny silver lining, the building was reportedly structurally sound. it doesn't need to be knocked down. when the va secretary visited the damaged hospital today, the agency could not say when they expect this hospital to reopen. this incredibly important facility. so manhattan veterans are being rerouted to brooklyn and queens. the v.a.'s regional office in new york is also closed down still due to damage from the storm. inside it is a mess. the v.a. veterans groups are doing what they can. like this mobile center they have set up to provide some of the counseling and benefits help and jobs help that the v.a. would usually provide from its shut-down facilities. they set up this temporary pharmacy at the damaged v.a. hospital. this picture was taken today.
3:48am
the storm hit last monday. the impact of this storm hitting veterans in particular so directly with this double whammy, the v.a. office and the v.a. hospital still being shut down, it's kind of hard to fathom. but this sunday is veterans day, which means more than ever it's time to fathom it and give props for the way veterans have been dealing with this particular hardship that hit them specifically in this storm. veterans have been volunteering in huge numbers to help everybody else. that's iraq and afghanistan veterans of america out in the rockaways. there's also a group of veterans from all over the country that volunteers as a group wherever and whenever a natural disaster hits. they have been in new york and new jersey and the whole region hit by the storm for over a week now. this sunday hundreds more are expected to join them cleaning up this devastated part of the country. that coordinated storm relief effort is what veterans are doing on veterans day, which is
3:49am
the day we're supposed to honor them. if you want to help out yourself or donate or want to attend a veterans day parade this sunday, we have posted links you might find helpful for doing that, at maddowblog.com. including some special resource links for veterans who are here in the storm-affected areas who have been making due with this incredible double whammy of no v.a. hospital for the foreseeable future in manhattan and no v.a. regional office. happy veterans day, everybody. it's an unusually tough one in this part of the country. we'll be right back. [ whistle blows ] hi victor! mom? i know you got to go in a minute but this is a real quick meal, that's perfect for two! campbell's chunky beef with country vegetables, poured over rice! [ male announcer ] campbell's chunky soup. it fills you up right.
3:50am
[ male announcer ] jill and her mouth have lived a great life. but she has some dental issues she's not happy about. so i introduced jill to crest pro-health for life. selected for people over 50. pro-health for life is a toothpaste that defends against tender, inflamed gums, sensitivity and weak enamel.
3:51am
conditions people over 50 experience. crest pro-health for life. so jill can keep living the good life. crest. life opens up when you do. so jill can keep living th♪ good life. ♪ hi dad. many years from now, when the subaru is theirs... hey. you missed a spot. ...i'll look back on this day and laugh. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. starts with arthritis pain and a choice. take tylenol or take aleve, the #1 recommended pain reliever by orthopedic doctors. just two aleve can keep pain away all day. back to the news. to compete on the global stage. what we need are people
3:52am
prepared for the careers of our new economy. by 2025 we could have 20 million jobs without enough college graduates to fill them. that's why at devry university, we're teaming up with companies like cisco to help make sure everyone's ready with the know how we need for a new tomorrow. [ male announcer ] make sure america's ready. make sure you're ready. at devry.edu/knowhow. ♪ it seems to me first of all from what i understand from doctors, that's really rare. if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try and shut that whole thing down. >> from what i understand from doctors. that guy todd akin is no more in
3:53am
politics. he lost his senate bid against claire mccaskill in missouri by 16 points. in order to run for the senate seat he lost, he had to give up his house seat in missouri. so come january todd akin will be gone from national politics. but until then, consider that this guy, who has this theory about the magical qualities of rapist sperm, which he says he learned from doctors, this guy, until he is gone from the house, will retain his seat on the house science committee. the republican party put todd akin on the science committee in congress. also, old roscoe bartlett who also just lost his seat. mr. bartlett was the one who said rape hardly ever causes pregnancies. he knows that because -- well who knows! but he's quite sure that that's true. the republicans put todd akin and rosco bartlett on the science committee in congress. such is the republican party's respect for science. and since the republicans did hold on to the house this year, the republicans still get to determine the membership of the
3:54am
house science committee. do you want to know who they're going to put in charge of it? >> we don't know what those other cycles were caused by in the past. could be dinosaur flatulence or who knows. but we do know that the co2 in the past had its time when it was greater as well. >> dana rohrabachar. republicans say they may but the dinosaur farts guy in charge of the science knitty for congress. or instead they might choose this guy. >> co2 is a natural gas. now does this mean that all of us have to put catalytic converters on our noses so that there is no co2 that escapes into the atmosphere every time we exhale? >> congressman jim sensenbrenner went on to say that it is propaganda that people think there's anything bad about carbon emissions. and he should know from propaganda since the place he was speeging at when he said that, when he said that thing
3:55am
about sticking catalytic converters up all our noses, where he was when he was saying that was at the heartland institute. the heartland institute is the group that put up these billboards saying if you believe in global warming, you're the unabomber. so those are the two people the republicans are choosing between to lead the house of representatives on matters of science. another republican member of the science committee who won his race and will therefore presumably be rejoining his colleagues there is this guy. >> i've come to understand that all that stuff i was taught about evolution and embryology and the big bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell. and it's lies to try and keep me and all the folks who were taught that from understanding that they need a savior. >> embryology is lies from the pit of hell. that guy is congressman paul brown of georgia. and on tuesday he won back his house seat, and therefore his place on the house science committee.
3:56am
there's no suspense about paul brown's re-election because he ran unopposed. but in a development worthy of national recognition, maybe a national round of applause, i need to tell you that nearly 4,000 of paul brown's constituents went in to the voting booth on tuesday, and decided that instead of just voting for unopposed paul brown, or instead of just not voting for anybody in that race, nearly 4,000 people in paul brown's district decided they would write in a worthy opponent for him. nearly 4,000 in his district went into the voting booth on tuesday and wrote in the name charles darwin. instead of voting for the evolution is lies from the pit of hill guy. which is maybe as good a reminder as we are ever going to get in this country that it is not just that when things seem dire that we should hope for improvement. sometimes even when things go great, good-bye todd akin. sometimes there is still room for yet more good news on top of something you already thought was pretty good. even great days sometimes get
3:57am
better. even something, for example, as great as a whiskey cocktail can be improved. so for a cocktail moment at the end of a rather stunning week in american politics, here's how you make an improved whiskey cocktail. all right, this is a jerry thomas drink that dates back to the 1870s. and a 19th century whiskey cocktail is what we now call an old-fashioned. it's whiskey with sugar and bitters. an improved whiskey cocktail is an improvement on that. the improvement is the addition of a couple of other sweetening agents in very small proportions. so where's my glass? so we start with absinthe. and weirdly, this is kind of a weird drink preparation technique but it works for me. put a little bit of absinthe in the glass and i'm not going to measure it, because after i swirl it around and coat the inside of the glass with it i'm just going to throw it out. into the trash. right into the sink. you don't need a lot of it.
3:58am
you just want the absinthe in the middle of the glass. now my glass is prepared. zero are you here? while i'm doing this other part, will you put ice in there? we've got absinthe-rinsed glass. that's zoe's putting ice in. in terms of making the rest of the cocktail, two dashes of bitters, a quarter of an ounce of this delicious thing that old italian ladies put on their fruit salad which is called maraschino. you know old italian ladies who do this? it looks like maraschino but they pronounce it maraschino. you just want a quarter ounce of this, which is not very much. a quarter ounce of maraschino. and a quarter ounce of sugar water. otherwise known as simple syrup. sugar and water in equal volume. oops. too much. never do that. there we go. never pour it back in the thing like i just did. it's my home bottle, what do i care? now, the whiskey part.
3:59am
two ounces of rye whiskey. if you can get bonded rye, which means it's 100 proof, you'll thank me. all right. so two ounces of rye. a quarter ounce of maraschino, a quarter ounce sugar syrup, two dashes of bitters, and -- oops. ice. and this is one of those drinks that you stir instead of shake. mm-hmm. and then you strain it into your delicious anacinth-rinsed glass that zoe has filled up with ice for you because you're too slow when it comes to the ice. and the finale, what i like to think of as the part where paul brown's constituents write in charles darwin as an opponent for him, even after you've already had a really good week as a liberal, the lemon twist. the improved whiskey cocktail.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)